History and
culture identify all human kind. The link between a man and his history is
unique and undeniable. Traditions and memories are transferred from generation
to generation, building up the culture, which unifies people. The evidence of
this evolution, the creation of a society trough time, is shown in many ancient
sculptures, paintings, etc.; now exhibited in museums all around the world.
Having said
that, it might be no alternatives: western museum should definitely return
foreign exhibits. It’s true that most of these museums have legally acquired these
artefacts, and are maintained in perfect conditions (expending quite a lot of
money). However, these artefacts can´t be bought, because they’re not a one-man’s
property, they’re the property of a society and all its generations. These
objects identify one culture, one place, one community. You cannot sell the
identity of a country.
On the other
hand, I don’t see the problem in lending artefacts to foreign nations, as long
as these governments recognize the property of the artefacts’ country.
A nation is
made by its culture and history, which are captured in ancient artefacts that
are priceless not only to one nation, but to the world. Can´t be sold, but they’re
worthy of admiration.
I like the idea of mankind history and to share the culture and treasures to each other. Such as the Viking life and legend exhibition is coming up with cooperation of Denmark and British museum. These alternative way could be possible for other controversial artefacts as well.
ReplyDeleteYou've made some very valid points, Alessio. I particularly like your sentences "These objects identify one culture, one place, one community. You cannot sell the identity of a country." The idea of objects being shared, so as many people as possible can see them, is a good compromise. Are you planning to go and see the exhibition of Colombian Gold or the Vikings Exhibition?
ReplyDelete